Members' web sites

Want to know more about individual Crime Writers? There's a full list of CWA members' web sites on our Links page.

Speakers Groups

Murder Squad logo

Who are the Murder Squad?

Ladykillers logo

Who are the Ladykillers?

Answers on our Speakers page!

Powered By Greymatter

Crimesheet

The weblog of the Crime Writers' Association

Wednesday, May 31st 2006

Changes of identity


On the whole, I agree with Yvonne - a writer should, usually, stick to the original name. But there's a problem with the 'readers read writers, not books'. If you are writing a book that will appeal to a different - or a wider - audience, then this can work against you. The books I wrote as 'Danuta Reah' are, among other things, frightening. Some people just don't like being frightened. The Forest of Souls is suspenseful and does have some scary moments, but it isn't as scary as books like Bleak Water or Only Darkness - so I think that's why my publishers decided to go with a new name. So, apologies to the original Carla Banks - I will bring some flowers to the cemetery next time I'm there.

Danuta Reah on Wednesday, May 31st 2006 @ 11:58 AM GMT [link]


The Dagger Awards - some thoughts from a writer


This is the first year for the new Daggers – and it’s been hectic, especially for the committee. Now the shortlists are out, it’s interesting to see what’s appeared. The Duncan Lawrie shortlist is an interesting mix of established writers and relatively new ones. My To Be Read list has now expanded by three books (three of them I have already read, the Ann Cleeves, the Simon Beckett and the Laura Wilson, any of which would be good winners in my view) so I’m giving myself a pat on the back for spotting the best reads of the year. And I’m lamenting the good reads that didn’t make it onto the list.

The International Dagger, which is where translated books are to be found is a new category. Its establishment was controversial, to say the least. I’ve discussed this in detail in the blog on my website, www.carlabanks.co.uk so I won’t re-rehearse the arguments here. The entry, in this short year, was higher than the entry of translated books for the Gold Dagger last year, so my personal hope, as a fan of European and Scandanavian crime fiction, is that a lot of new authors – or new to me – will appear here. And I hope we might see writers from farther afield being translated, published in the UK and entered for this award. Again, my TBR pile is increased – by four this time. I’ve read the Fred Vargas (I read two of her books before I found out that Fred was a her not a him) and picked up the Andrea Camilleri as a ‘pot luck’. If I read two books a week, I will get through the TBR pile by Christmas – except it will have grown again by then.

And I’m really pleased to be on the Dagger in the Library shortlist. I’m a great fan of libraries as places that really work hard to promote reading. I do a lot of library events, especially as part of LadyKillers. Which brings me to the point that LadyKillers has done particularly well this year – two of us, Lesley Horton and I, are on the Dagger in the Library list.

Do awards matter? Some of the most popular authors have never won an award. I think they do. In some cases, an award can save a good writer from obscurity or even the scrap heap. With so many books being published, good writers can be missed, and publishers now require high sales from writers so a good writer can be dropped before the ‘slow burn’ route takes effect. Awards, let’s be honest, help to increase sales. But it’s also the recognition when someone with knowledge and expertise (in this case, library readers and librarians) says, ‘Yes, these books are very good.’ It makes all the solitary hours with a computer screen worth while.

Danuta Reah on Wednesday, May 31st 2006 @ 11:50 AM GMT [link]

Sunday, May 7th 2006

Spoilers

mood: Irritated

Feedback from the readers is a necessary and valuable thing and so the review sections of Amazon are a useful tool but, saddoe that I am, when I browsed Amazon.com this week I found not so much a review, more a detailed description of the plot, complete with the final page twist. The author of this seemed to think that by adopting a sarcastic tone she was making legitimate comment.

Nor was there any informed analysis with details as to why she was not greatly enthralled, where I had gone wrong, how I could improve. All she has done is done potential damage to my sales by spoiling it for others.

The ironic thing is that she didn't hate or even dislike the book as she gave it three stars; not great, I grant you, but hardly damning.

What was the point?

Keith McCarthy on Sunday, May 7th 2006 @ 01:47 PM GMT [link]

Thursday, May 4th 2006

Tell Does Show

mood: Disappointed

Since when does Minette Walters tell instead of showing? Her Tinderbox was most disappointing. I know she wrote it in a hurry for an anthology and she re-used the same themes (to a much better effect) in Acid Row, but that's no excuse for half-sketched characters and ragged pacing. I'm proud to say, I could have done better.

Yvonne Eve Walus on Thursday, May 4th 2006 @ 09:40 AM GMT [link]

Go to: Latest Crimesheet entries or the Archives

Site map

Front page

Copyright © The CWA and individual contributors